A
Monthly Review of Issues Affecting Commercial Telemarketing by Copilevitz & Canter,
LLC, Attorneys at Law
July, 2004
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
The FTC has signed 62 million telephone numbers to the national “do-not-call” list
and logged more than 428,000 complaints from consumers against more than
130,000 companies. As a whole, less than one percent of persons whose numbers
are on the list have complained about its operations or calls from telemarketers.
The FTC has issued its biannual agenda which includes a summary of its actions
under the Telemarketing Sales Rule. Upcoming regulatory action on the rule
includes a new fee schedule for the “do-not-call” list to go
into effect September 1, 2004.
The FTC has proposed a rule regarding definitions applicable
to its regulations promulgated pursuant to the Fair Credit
Reporting Act. The FTC relies on its analysis of the established
business relationship exemption for the Telemarketing Sales
Rule and has concluded that a consumer would reasonably expect
to receive information from an affiliate of an entity from
which the consumer requested information.
The FTC has obtained a final court order shutting down an
Arizona based company which allegedly defrauded consumers by
selling a service to safeguard personal financial information
from unscrupulous telemarketers. The order prohibits false
representations in the future and billing consumer accounts
without prior authorization.
U.S. CONGRESS
A bill has been introduced in the Senate called the
Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2004. The law would amend the TCPA
to allow unsolicited advertisements to be sent to businesses
with whom the sendor has an established business relationship
and the advertisement contains certain disclosures. Recipient
businesses should be allowed to make “do-not-fax” requests
which would sever the ability of the business to send such
advertisements. The bill would allow the FCC to determine a
time limit on established business relationships. It would
also require the Commission to submit an annual report to Congress
regarding enforcement of junk fax provision laws.
ARIZONA
Arizona has amended its telemarketing registration
law to clarify that entities required to file a limited registration,
only, are subject to the provisions of the national “do-not-call” list
for intrastate calls.
ARKANSAS
Arkansas has filed suit against a satellite television company
from Texas alleging violations of the national “do-not-call” registry.
CALIFORNIA
A bill has been proposed in the California Assembly which would
prohibit sellers of mobile telephone services from selling
or licensing lists of subscribers to any third party. The
bill would also require explicit “opt in” for
the telecommunications provider to include subscribers in
directories of telephone numbers.
A bill requiring disclosure of the location of a customer
sales representative has been amended to require disclosures
only upon request. The law would apply to inbound or outbound
telephone customer service centers.
GEORGIA
A n appellate court has overturned a trial court’s ruling
that a class action in Georgia should not have been certified
as a class action. The appellate court ruled that the action
should proceed as a class action.
KANSAS
A college has won a federal court proceeding ruling that its
insurer was required to pay for its defense in the face of
a claim that it violated the TCPA restrictions on unsolicited
faxes. The college had been sued by a trucking company in
eastern Illinois. You may have read that this part of Illinois
is one of the class action capitols of the country.
LOUISIANA
A bill has been proposed in the Louisiana House which would
change the state curfew from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., to 9:00
a.m. to 9:00 p.m.; require the caller to state his first
and last name within the first 25 seconds of the phone call;
and provide a telephone number consumers can call to be added
to the telemarketer’s “do-not-call” list.
MICHIGAN
A law has been enacted in Michigan which would create a law
enforcement memorial and monument but bans fund raising for
that monument through the use of telemarketing.
NEW MEXICO
The New Mexico Human Services Department has proposed a regulation
which would ban telemarketing or face-to-face marketing with
potential members of managed care health insurance organizations.
Rules like this are considered to be content-based restrictions
on speech. It is possible that this regulation is unconstitutional
under this analysis.
NEW YORK
A New York court has ruled that a TCPA plaintiff alleging violation
of the restriction on recorded voice messages was not properly
filed as a class action. The court ruled that New York law
specifically prohibited it from being a class action. New
York provides that a statute imposing a penalty or minimum
measure of recovery is not subject to class action unless
it specifically states that class action relief is available.
OKLAHOMA
A suit has been filed in Oklahoma alleging that a satellite
company failed to register as a commercial telephone seller
and used an autodialer to place calls to a 911 service, hospital
and a police station. Calls using predictive dialers are
prohibited to all public safety telephone numbers including
police stations, etc.
TEXAS
A Texas appellate court has held that Texas must “opt
out” of private TCPA suits. Otherwise, such suits are
allowed in state court in Texas.
VIRGINIA
Virginia’s amended telemarketing law went into effect
July 1, 2004. It contains a ban on abandonment and requires
that telephone solicitors adhere to the national “do-not-call” list
law.
WISCONSIN
A Wisconsin judge has struck down portions of Wisconsin’s “do-not-call” list
regulations. The opinion upheld the fees provision portion of the list and
struck down portions of the regulations leveling fines and creating private
causes of action under the regulation.